The SEC filed a 421-page proposal on September 1 to overhaul its transfer agent rules for the first time since the late 1970s, adding requirements for blockchain recordkeeping, cybersecurity, and tokenized securities infrastructure.
The proposal, designated Rule 34-106246, updates requirements for the roughly 273 registered transfer agents operating in the United States. Most existing rules date from an era when paper certificates were standard and firms processed ownership changes by hand. The comment period will run for 60 days after Federal Register publication.
Transfer agents sit at the center of securities infrastructure. They maintain an issuer official ownership records, register securities transfers, and track whether a company has issued more shares than authorized. Many also handle dividend distributions, fund redemptions, and corporate actions. The role has changed dramatically since the 1970s as markets moved from floor trading to electronic systems, but the regulatory framework largely stayed put.
What the SEC wants to change
The proposal revises rules across five areas: registration, reporting, recordkeeping, processing times, and the protection of securities and client funds. It adds new requirements for restrictive legends, paying-agent services, and oversight of third-party technology providers. An older exemption rule would be rescinded, and a single record-retention period would replace the current patchwork of timelines that transfer agents have navigated for decades.
Proposed amendments to Rule 17ad-7 would require transfer agents using electronic recordkeeping to install controls that protect the integrity, availability, reproducibility, redundancy, and continuity of their records. Rule 17ad-31 would tighten restrictive-legend requirements, potentially using smart contract logic to enforce transfer restrictions directly onchain. These two rules alone represent the most significant changes to transfer-agent compliance in a generation.
The SEC said market participants are actively seeking to bring blockchain-native transfer agents into the U.S. market. Firms are building systems for blockchain-based ownership records, tokenized fund administration, and cross-chain interoperability, according to the proposal. Transfer agents interacting with these technologies would need to manage risks around blockchain data integrity, security of tokenized assets, and distributed ledger operational models.
Those adopting AI or automated technologies would face similar new obligations. The commission noted that as securities records move away from paper, its existing requirements do not fully address information security, cybersecurity, disaster recovery, or the operational risks created by connected digital systems. The proposal turns these from best-practice recommendations into formal compliance requirements with enforcement teeth.
Why it matters for tokenization
The overhaul lands at a moment when tokenization is moving from pilot programs to production. BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and Securitize have all launched or expanded tokenized fund products in the past 18 months. Regulated transfer-agent infrastructure is a bottleneck for scaling these products because issuers need a qualified entity to maintain ownership ledgers whether those ledgers run on Ethereum, Solana, or a private chain.
Several firms are already positioned to benefit. Securitize operates as both a registered broker-dealer and transfer agent, handling KYC, investor onboarding, and legally recognized ownership records for tokenized equities. The company launched fully regulated onchain trading for tokenized equities in May 2026 in partnership with Jump Trading and Jupiter. tZERO, owned by Overstock parent Medici Ventures, is similarly registered and recently partnered with NYSE parent ICE on tokenized securities infrastructure.
Injective became an SEC-registered transfer agent in August 2026, framing the registration as a way to keep track of who owns tokenized assets and how those change hands within a regulated framework. Superstate registered its blockchain-based transfer agent in March 2025 to support tokenized funds, including its Short Duration U.S. Government Securities Fund.
Firms like Securitize that built their businesses around blockchain-native infrastructure may find themselves better positioned than legacy operators, while giants like Computershare bring scale and existing issuer relationships that newer entrants cannot easily replicate. The SEC proposal does not pick winners, but it creates a level playing field where both models can compete under the same rules.
Broader SEC push
The transfer-agent proposal sits alongside several other SEC rulemaking efforts targeting digital assets. On the same day, the commission published Regulation Crypto Assets, which would create two new exemptions to help crypto firms raise between $5 million and $75 million. On August 25, the SEC sent proposed custody-rule changes for investment advisers and investment companies to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review.
SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins said the overhaul ensures regulations reflect agents adoption of electronic communications and blockchain technology. The commission also scheduled a September 17 roundtable on extending market hours to 24/7, a move that would require transfer agents to process securities transactions outside traditional business windows.
The January 2026 Statement on Tokenized Securities confirmed that securities represented on blockchains remain securities regardless of the technology used to record ownership. That guidance, combined with the transfer-agent overhaul, gives firms a clearer path to register and operate blockchain-based infrastructure within existing law. For an industry that has spent years lobbying for regulatory clarity, the proposal represents concrete movement toward a workable framework that both startups and established institutions can follow.
Industry commenters will have 60 days to respond after the proposal appears in the Federal Register. Final rules typically take 12 to 18 months for major overhauls of this kind, meaning implementation could stretch into late 2027 or early 2028. Until then, blockchain-native transfer agents will continue operating under the existing framework, adapting vintage compliance requirements to modern technology as best they can.
discussion